Oil giant Shell beats first-quarter profit estimates, launches $3.5 billion share buyback

Environment

In this article

The Shell logo is displayed outside a petrol station in Radstock on February 17, 2024 in Somerset, England.
Matt Cardy | Getty Images News | Getty Images

British oil giant Shell on Thursday reported stronger-than-expected first-quarter profit, boosted by higher refining margins and robust oil trading.

Shell reported adjusted earnings of $7.7 billion for the first three months of the year, beating analyst expectations of $6.5 billion, according to an LSEG-compiled consensus.

A year earlier, the company posted adjusted earnings $9.6 billion over the same period and $7.3 billion for the final three months of 2023.

Shell CEO Wael Sawan described the results as “another quarter of strong operational and financial performance.”

The company announced a $3.5 billion share buyback program, which it expects to complete over the next three months. Its dividend remains unchanged.

Shell shares are up nearly 10% year-to-date.

Shell’s first-quarter profit was down roughly 20% compared to the same period a year earlier, reflecting a broader energy industry trend. 

U.S. oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron, as well as France’s TotalEnergies and Norway’s Equinor, all reported a steep year-on-year fall in first-quarter profits last week.

The world’s largest oil and gas majors posted record full-year profits in 2022 following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. More recently, however, revenues have been hit by tumbling gas prices.

Spot gas prices in Europe have fallen more than 45% over the last year, due in part to mild winter weather and an abundance of supplies.

Shell’s British rival BP is scheduled to report its first-quarter earnings on May 7.

Articles You May Like

Ancient Bronze Statues Unearthed from Etruscan Healing Spring in Italy
FAST Telescope Detects New Pulsar PSR J1922+37 in Open Cluster NGC 6791
Electric cargo bike firm Zedify seeks delivery of new backers
Coroner’s conclusion into TV doctor’s death
Trump aide’s Mandelson jibe was clearly designed to stir things up – but why?